As theJurassic Parkfranchise has demonstrated , trapping prehistoric monsters on an island with sting - sized tourer may not be the smartest idea ( book - breaking boxful bureau numbers aside ) . On top of the safety worry , the cost of running a Jurassic Park would raise its own Seth of pretty pricey issues . Energy supplierE.ONrecently collaborated with physicists from Imperial College London to calculate how much push the fictitious attraction would corrode up in the material world .
The infographic below take up component that come out in both theJurassic ParkandJurassic Worldfilms . One of the most costly feature article in the park would be the aquarium for holding the monumental leatherneck reptiles . To keep the water heated and hospitable class - circle , the park would need to pay an energy bill of confining to $ 3 million a year .
sustain a pterosaur aviary would be an even more expensive endeavor . To come in up with this price , the researchers look at the annual amount of energy consumed by theEden Project , a monumental biome complex in the UK . Using that data , they close that a complex body part built to holdwinged creaturesbigger than any bird active today would sum up to $ 6.6 million a year in energy price .
Other facilities they envisioned for the island admit an egg brooder , conceptus fridge , hotel , and emergency bunker . And of course , there would be electric fences run 24/7 to keep the familial attractions separated from green invitee . In total , the physicists estimated that the park would use 455 million kilowatt time of day a twelvemonth , or the eq of 30,000 middling homes . That annual energy bill make out out to more or less $ 63 million .
Keep in mind that vigor would still only make up one part of Jurassic Park ’s divinatory budget — factorization in money for lawsuits would be a whole unlike story .
