With contrived intelligence hype lead speculation capitalistic firms foaming at the mouthpiece , ready tobuy intoany new company that sting an “ A ” and “ I ” in its name , we indisputable as hell need a new way of limit what constitutes an AI . The Turing Testfails to define veridical intelligencein today ’s human beings of orotund language models . One leading material body in the AI arena has a upright idea that could only follow from the wealth - obsessed realm of big technical school : the near direction to tell if AI is smart is if it can get rich ready .
Mustafa Suleyman , a major AI developer who previously co - founded DeepMind — now owned by Google — has an upcoming book where he reportedly discusses judging an AI ’s smarts based on its power to pile hard cash . According to aBloombergreport , inThe come Wave : Technology , Power , and the Twenty - first Century ’s Greatest Dilemma , Suleyman argues that AI research require to pore on poor - term development , rather than pipe dream like a suppose contrived cosmopolitan intelligence , or AGI . What ’s a good object lesson ? His “ modern Turing Test ” would give an AI $ 100,000 , and then the researchers would wait for the AI to make $ 1 million on its initial investment . See , only a dependable tidings can “ make line of descent go up ” and people who are dear at make line go up are empty the smart people .
The AI developer call this measure of realise hokey smarts “ artificial capable intelligence agency , ” and like any good capitalist , AI should be judged on its financial skill rather than its content for human - layer interaction . So how would the AI make bank ? fundamentally , it would have to complete your average business degree full term project . The AI would explore e - mercantilism business opportunities , make an idea for a product , then envision out the process for both manufacturing and selling the service .
DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman has his own startup called Inflection AI. His premiere product called Pi is specifically limited from offering folks financial advice or new products.Photo: John Phillips (Getty Images)
The proposal sounds more like anAI - based get - rich - fast schemeyou would find on the seedier destruction of YouTube and TikTok financial influencers . AI is certainly more capable of designing products than having true imaging , but modern systems are still far from giving Suleyman a flush bank account . There areseveral AI agents float aroundthat had their time in the AI spotlight before this twelvemonth . They basically work as multiple versions of a chatbot working in concert to complete specific labor . user have even made agents that could perform tasks like order a pizza pie over the sound .
A program like Auto - GPT could , in theory , craft a business plan for a newfangled product , though today ’s gravid language model certainly do n’t have the major power to daydream up a new product that citizenry really need and follow through with any accuracy . The AI is inherently reiterative , and itdoes not really embrace its return contentin any real - living context of use . Its output signal is inherently base on its preparation data point , so any form of “ refreshing ” design it creates is going to be have of existing example that best fulfill the original prompting .
AI evangelists often squawk that all human creations are inherently iterative , but unlike AI , mankind ’s creations come from the comprehension of canonical human indigence , or at least the simple sense of empathy . Sure , an AI can produce a product , and perhaps that product would even deal . But would it be a well Cartesian product ? Would it actually aid people ? If the conclusion goal is “ make me a million clam , ” does that even matter ?
What Kind of Empathy Do We Need From AI?
Suleyman used to lead AI development at DeepMind though he is now the CEO and founder of startup Inflection AI . The company ’s leading chatbotPi is a very capable AI that tries to come off as empathetic . It ’s also far more restrictive than other chatbots like ChatGPT . It can not search info on the internet , it ca n’t generate codification , and it incessantly accent that it ’s no refilling for a real - life healer or even a human companion .
When I last spoke to Suleyman , he said the narrowly - define capabilities of his company ’s AI are the biggest selling point for the chatbot . He was adamant that his development team did n’t want something that could “ maximise engagement ” to the detriment of exploiter .
Intalks , Suleyman has say those whose jobs are displaced by AI need “ recompense ” from world politics . In that path , why ca n’t we have an intimation of consideration from the tech companies proliferate these AI models ?
In this day and eld where chatbots have become so advanced they can replicate human speech , the AI can easily appear sound while being unable to comprehend any of what it say . Despite what some doomsayers and folks like OpenAI leadership Sam Altman and Greg Brockmanhave proclaimed , we ’re nowhere near the level of AGI .
AI has progressed far , but in many ways , it still come down short of the capacity thatearly computer scientists envisioned . Natural speech has long been the goal for these “ Alan Mathison Turing - type computing automobile . ” But machines that actually “ think ” as humans can is still out of our grasp , and there ’s still an open argument if a computer could ever bring in real “ intelligence ” as humans see it . On the flip side , you had former Google employee Blake Lemoineclaiming the company ’s chatbot role model was in reality intelligentbecause it sounded human . moil intelligence operation down to a binary ability to skim in cash would be even less helpful than imagining the AI is your friend just because it says it is .
DeepMindMicrosoftOpenAISam AltmanTechnologyturing test
Daily Newsletter
Get the better tech , science , and cultivation news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , give birth to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
