Donald Trump.Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
In February, the National Archives and Records Administration said in a statement thatfederal government officials had gone to Florida to retrieve 15 boxes of documentsand other items from Trump — which the agency said should have been handed over at the end of his time in office.
According to the Presidential Records Act, created in the years following PresidentRichard Nixon’s Watergate scandal,the president must preserve all records created during their tenureso that they can be handed over to the National Archives.
Before arriving at Trump’s property on Monday, the FBI obtained a warrant, which signals that ajudge or magistrate had to sign off on the search. To get that approval, law enforcement officials must show probable cause for conducting the search. That means there should be reasonable information to support the possibility that evidence of illegality will be found when the warrant is executed.
Mar-a-Lago Club.Joe Raedle/Getty
Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE’s free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer.
That does not mean, however, that Trump is accused of a crime. The search is merely part of the Justice Department’s ongoing investigation, which has not reached any conclusions.
For more on Donald Trump, listen below to our daily podcast PEOPLE Every Day.
Title 18 U.S. Code § 2071states that anyone who “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys” official government documents “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”
That seems pretty clear, but it’s not.
In a report about whether Trump could be barred from running for office if he is convicted of such a crime,The New York Timescites legal scholars who point out that the U.S. Constitution — not criminal law — sets the eligibility requirements for the presidency as well as how someone can be disqualified from holding the office through impeachment.
Prominent Democratic attorney Marc Elias called the search of Mar-a-Lago a “potential blockbuster in American politics” on Twitter, based on Title 18 U.S. Code § 2071.
But in a follow-up tweet, Elias acknowledged that the law is not cut and dry when it comes to presidents and presidential candidates.
“Yes, I recognize the legal challenge that application of this law to a president would garner (since qualifications are set in Constitution),“he wrote on Twitter. “But the idea that a candidate would have to litigate this is during a campaign is in my view a ‘blockbuster in American politics.'”
source: people.com
